0569, we recognized an error in the scoring calculations. “After initially publishing the eligible list for Exam No. “DCAS ensures that all exam administration is a fair and transparent process for all candidates,” Anessa Hodgson, a DCAS spokesperson, said in a statement. The agency admitted, however, that the initial list mistakenly made test-takers' scores count for 85 percent of their grade with seniority and merit awards only counting for 15 percent, a far cry from the 50-50 split that is DCAS’ usual means of scoring. “We just want transparency.”ĭCAS, in a statement, did not address the concerns raised by Finegan and the UFOA regarding the Oct. “It’s all over the place and we don’t know why they scored it the way they did,” Finegan, who’s also the Manhattan trustee for the UFA, said. The lowest score on the updated list is a 73.0, three above the passing cutoff, and Finegan says that his position was vastly different on the two lists that DCAS posted. “We believe that promotion exams with standard grading procedures are imperative in maintaining the merit-based promotion.” “This is a significant concern to the UFOA and its members,” the union’s message said. This would mean that a firefighter who got 30 or more incorrect answers on the 100-question test would be able to achieve a passing score of 70 due solely to the curve. 15 to reduce the value of an incorrect answer below one. In a message to its members in early November, the UFOA said that it had made “several inquiries” about the grading of the second exam but added that the union has been “unable to get definitive details about the grading system used.” The union said that it appears DCAS curved the Oct. Both the Uniformed Fire Officers Association and the Uniformed Firefighters Association have rebuked DCAS for bungling the two promotional lists and for lacking transparency. “They changed the whole way that they weighed the test,” firefighter Patrick Finegan, one of the 1,677 names on the updated list generated by DCAS told The Chief this week.įinegan said DCAS officials have not thoroughly addressed concerns raised about the second list and have failed to explain to firefighters how it generated those results. 15.īut firefighters responded by filing even more complaints with the FDNY, DCAS and their unions, calling attention to what they said were remaining errors and confusion with the curve and grading system DCAS used to generate the second list. They have recalculated the list with the correct formula for weighting,” such that seniority and award points and test scores contribute equally to final exam scores, according to the order from department officials.ĭCAS took down its list soon after putting it up and posted the updated list Oct. “DCAS discovered that the wrong weighting formula was used for seniority and awards, resulting in inaccuracy. DCAS then “performed an additional review of scores and discovered that the published list was in fact, inaccurate,” according to an Oct. 24 and firefighters immediately complained to both DCAS and the FDNY about how the agency calculated test-takers' seniority and merit awards into their final scores.Īfter the promotion list from the December 2022 exam was posted, the department requested that DCAS check the results. The FDNY, firefighters and their unions have sounded alarms about the results of a promotional exam they say were twice botched by the Department of Citywide Administrative Services.ĭCAS released the hiring list from the promotional exam to firefighter lieutenant on Sept.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |